Hijra dating

06 Jun

In a sixth-century treatise on the calculation of Easter, Dionysius 'the Little' first proposed to count from the birth of Christ to avoid honouring the hated persecutor Diocletian.

This practice is briefly alluded to at the end of the treatise.Some non-Christians use the abbreviations AD and BC without intending to acknowledge the Christian connotation.Some people prefer the alternatives ' CE' and ' BCE', arguing that they are more neutral terms (see below).This treatise of the Diwan al-Buhuth wa al-Eftaa' (Research & Fatwa-Issuing Department), previously unseen in the outside world, concerns the question of whether one can use 'Miladi' dating, best known in its current and most widely used form as the Gregorian calendar.In short, the conclusion is that the Islamic State must ultimately erase all traces of Miladi dating as it is a system of dating associated with the disbelievers, in particular the Christians.Arabic sources, such as an inscription of Mu`awiyah from Taif (modern Saudi Arabia), as well as Chinese sources, mention only the year, without reference to the dating system.Indeed, Mu`awiyah’s inscriptions have no Islamic content whatsoever, posing additional serious questions about the traditional narrative.On the basis of the principle that one must not imitate the disbelievers, one should not use Miladi dating.Rather, the system to be followed is the 'Hijri' dating, which begins from the time of the migration [hijra] of the Prophet from Mecca to Medina [c. However, as with the concept of tribal organization of society, there is some clash between reality and theory.For decades, it has been the global standard, recognized by international institutions such as the United Nations and the Universal Postal Union.This is due to the prevalence of Christianity in the Western world, the great influence of the Western world on science, technology and commerce, as well as the fact that the solar Gregorian calendar has, for a long time, been considered to be astronomically correct.