Carbon dating inaccuracy error fallacy

18 Jul

Critics of carbon dating point to these limitations, usually by pointing to the wildly inaccurate results obtained by dating very inappropriate samples, and claim that therefore carbon dating is wrong and should never be used.

The fact is, of course, that the scientists who actually use it are well aware of these limitations and make sure to work within them. Usually when they carbon date sea life or something that eats sea life, since carbon dating doesn't work on sea life or anything that eats a lot of it. Scientists know it doesn't work on sea life, so they don't use it to date sea life!

The bone has long ago rotted away and has been replaced by rock.

What many do not realize is that carbon dating is not used to date dinosaurs. Carbon dating is only accurate back a few thousand years.

The results can be as much as 150 million years different from each other! They then pick the date they like best, based upon their preconceived notion of how old their theory says the fossil should be .

So they start with the assumption that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago, then manipulate the results until they agree with their conclusion. So why is it that if the date doesn't fit the theory, they change the facts?

Most scientists today believe that life has existed on the earth for billions of years.

This belief in long ages for the earth and the existence of life is derived largely from radiometric dating.